Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

research methodology

  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    Open Question March 11: Free Speech, but who draws the lines? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdx9n317Wpw 

    Free speech rules and culture today have a huge impact on the future:

    • Tech companies + algorithms determine who gets heard in 'public'... so government vs citizen doesn't touch today's real power struggles

    • AI: when you can clone anyone’s voice or face, what’s protected and what’s harm?

    • Political shifts: old arguments on who's defending or restricting speech (and why) don't hold, making it a topic where fresh thinking actually matters. Eg: The political left (eg ACLU defending neo-Nazis' right to march) used to be standard bearers, where now, the left is more likely to argue that unregulated speech causes real harm to marginalized communities.

    This conversation will inform a live interview tomorrow with Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), the leading free speech advocacy and litigation organization in the United States. A graduate of Stanford Law School, he has led FIRE since 2001, growing it from a six-person operation to a 120-person powerhouse, and is the co-author of The Coddling of the American Mind (with Jonathan Haidt)

    #openquestion 

    stripey7•...
    Indeed. As I suggested above, a cultic studies perspective seems pretty relevant here. Several parts of Robert Lifton's eight-point description of ideological totalism, including sacred science, language loading, milieu control, and demand for purity are observable in the way the...
    research methodology
    child sexual abuse
    cultic studies
    scientific skepticism
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    I just noticed how the "no-self" doctrine supports the "materialist industrial epistemological complex". My friend Divia has coined this intense-but-great phrase "So “materialist epistemology industrial complex” is my own mental handle, and it might be silly but I like it for now.

    I claim that there’s some memeset that launders legitimacy from “everything is made out of stuff in a refuctionistic way, seems like the laws of physics
    " 

    And today I was noticing how the Buddhist doctrine of 'no-self' contributes to this whole way of thinking—

    by denying that there's a self (claiming instead what we call a "self" are five aggregrates/skandas that interact in a way that seems selfy but doesn't actually constitute a real thing) this thinking can fall trap to leaving the so-called objective/external world pre-existent, out-there, reducing it to just physics.

    —at least as its imported into the USA. And probably not how it is interpreted by deep Mahayana practitioners, for example, or people who have actually reached the nondual nirvana state advertised by the practice and that gave rise to the doctrine, who would experience this as a false duality and notice that whatever we normally think of a subject would need to be included/accounted for in/as the object.

    jordanSA•...
    I really appreciate you pointing to the 'claim' nature of this.  I think there's something very important and tricky about distinguishing ontological claims and methodological claims... I don't really know how to do it well, it's more intuitive....
    philosophy
    epistemology
    research methodology
    Comments
    0
  • dara_like_sara avatar

    Reproductive rights. I have a really hard time understanding why folks support stripping reproductive rights before we’ve tackled better support for children and families in the US.

    From my perspective, the better we can support children, mothers, and families more broadly, the less we’ll actually have unplanned pregnancies.

    It just seems wise to really take care of those that are alive right now and try to improve their lives.

    jordanSA•...
    yeah i think there’s a lot research that’s gone into this, and idk if there’s a consensus yet but i’d love to get a summary. I like what Hans Rosling (Factfulness, https://www.gapminder.org/tools/#$chart-type=bubbles&url=v2) and Max Rose https://ourworldindata.org/ do in terms of...
    economics
    public health
    data analysis
    research methodology
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    The Relateful Company should embrace more job titles. We’re under-appreciating orange.

    We’ve included the green critiques, like the classic:

    What gets measured gets managed — even when it’s pointless to measure and manage it, and even if it harms the purpose of the organisation to do so - V. F. Ridgway, 1956

    But we need to embrace more healthy competition, striving for excellence, even rankings.

    one way we can do this is to make more liberal use of titles, and brag on people. @Valerie Daniel is the MANAGING DIRECTOR, and we should have her listed as such in emails and things

    What else is healthy orange and how can we transclude it?
    What do we already do that is already healthy orange?

    jordanSA•...
    fwiw, re believability scores (and somewhat defensively) I believe we’ve always planned to do A/B testing. There was never, ever the thought that we’d stick with the first set of anything—scoring 1-5 versus 1-10 versus 1-7; the particular categories, looking at where they grouped...
    communication
    team collaboration
    research methodology
    a/b testing
    experimentation
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    The Relateful Company should embrace more job titles. We’re under-appreciating orange.

    We’ve included the green critiques, like the classic:

    What gets measured gets managed — even when it’s pointless to measure and manage it, and even if it harms the purpose of the organisation to do so - V. F. Ridgway, 1956

    But we need to embrace more healthy competition, striving for excellence, even rankings.

    one way we can do this is to make more liberal use of titles, and brag on people. @Valerie Daniel is the MANAGING DIRECTOR, and we should have her listed as such in emails and things

    What else is healthy orange and how can we transclude it?
    What do we already do that is already healthy orange?

    daveSA•...
    I want to get a bit concrete here. There is a bunch of work about experiment / survey / psychometric testing design that has all kinds of tools that seem useful here. I’m in no way an expert here, or even barely experienced....
    communication
    psychometrics
    human behavior
    data analysis
    experiment design
    inferential statistics
    interpersonal dynamics
    research methodology
    social science research
    survey design
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...